Login
Welcome back to ESG.Guide
Register now to list your organisation
Please provide a correct email address.
Password must be at least 10 characters containing upper-case, lower-case and numeric characters.
Password confirmation doesn't match the original password.
List Your Organisation Here
Back to Insights

Survey: Companies and Employees See a Need for Reform and Want a Flexible Second Pillar

According to respondents, the Austrian pension system is not sustainable, primarily due to demographic change.

Published by
Valida Vorsorge Management
on 2026-07-15
Photo credit: eup
Martin Sardelic, CEO Valida Vorsorge Management
The Austrian pension system faces major challenges. A qualitative survey commissioned by Valida Vorsorge Management shows that pressure for reform is increasing significantly, primarily due to demographic change. Knowledge of and trust in occupational pension plans remain insufficient. In light of the initial reform steps recently presented by the government, the results make it clear: Not only are structural reforms needed, but also greater transparency, information, and a general shift in societal attitudes.
Austria’s pension system is in need of reform
Valida commissioned the opinion research institute Triple M to conduct a qualitative survey in the form of focus groups. In the spring, employees, employers, company executives, and HR managers of various ages and from different industries were surveyed.
The study paints a clear picture: All respondents perceive the Austrian pension system as in need of reform, particularly due to demographic change and the increasing strain on the pay-as-you-go system. There is therefore a strong desire for a robust second pillar.
Triple M Managing Director Christina Matzka: “Respondents expect to receive around 50% of their net salary as a pension in the future. This reflects very low confidence in the system and a high degree of uncertainty. The second pillar is currently perceived as stronger than it actually is, but when asked, respondents lack basic knowledge about employer-sponsored retirement plans.”
Major Knowledge Gaps Regarding Occupational Retirement Plans
The survey reveals significant gaps in understanding the second pillar. Many participants continue to associate occupational pension plans primarily with the former severance pay. The “New Severance Pay” is usually not even perceived as part of retirement planning, largely due to the frequently chosen option of a one-off payment. The actual amount of contributions and their impact on the pension are also unclear in most cases.
In general, however, occupational retirement plans are recognized as very beneficial. Respondents would like to see higher ongoing contributions from their occupational retirement plans to boost their retirement benefits.
“The results confirm what we see every day: There is a basic awareness of the issue, but knowledge about occupational pension plans remains very limited,” says Martin Sardelic, CEO of Valida Vorsorge Management. “If we want to stabilize the system in the long term, we must significantly strengthen the second pillar. Greater transparency—and thus greater trust in the system and in investments in the capital market—is essential for this.”
Occupational retirement plans must be simple and flexible
From the respondents’ perspective, the ideal occupational pension plan should be simple, secure, and at the same time flexible. There is a clear desire for options, such as regarding payouts, investments, or voluntary contributions. In any case, occupational pension plans should make a noticeable contribution to the total pension in the future. Respondents agree that more money is needed from the second pillar.
Clear differences emerge between the generations: Younger people are more open to the capital markets and cite structural challenges such as declining birth rates or later entry into the workforce. Older people, on the other hand, focus on specific issues of fairness, planning security, and the actual pension amount.
“We see a tension: On the one hand, there is a growing awareness that the existing system alone will not be sufficient; on the other hand, there is still a lack of trust in supplementary models,” says Philipp Mayer, a member of the Executive Board of Valida Vorsorge Management. “This is precisely where clear framework conditions and targeted incentives are needed so that occupational pension plans can realize their full potential.”
Mayer continues: “If, as a result of the approved reforms, people will in the future have to decide for themselves whether they want to have their second-pillar funds invested more effectively and make them part of their monthly pension, we urgently need to invest in education and information.”
Experts on the Multi-Pillar Model
The surveyed CEOs and HR managers confirm the need for action. While they generally assess the Austrian pension system as stable, they see it coming under increasing pressure due to demographic trends, rising government subsidies, and structural weaknesses.
In particular, the heavy reliance on the first pillar and a comparatively underdeveloped occupational pension system are viewed critically. In the long term, the experts expect a greater shift toward a balanced multi-pillar model in which occupational pensions play a significantly larger role. Furthermore, individual responsibility must be strengthened. Countries such as Denmark are cited as role models.
Loading...