Avoiding greenwashing in investment portfolios through consistent emissions classification and transparent reporting of derivatives
Paper published by Finreon on the concept of carbon footprint and the consideration of derivatives in carbon reporting.
2023-08-15
Published by Finreon
Dr. Ralf Seiz, CEO and founder, Finreon - Lecturer University of St.Gallen
Dr. Christian Vial, Head of Innovation & Research, Finreon
Arnaud Gougler, Head of Strategic Projects & ESG, Finreon
St. Gallen - Schweiz - April 2023
As the world faces the threat of climate change, investors and financial institutions are increasingly looking at investment portfolios’ carbon characteristics. Like other metrics and communication around investment, transparency and clear reporting on carbon characteristics of investment portfolios are paramount. To achieve this, we have identified three key elements that should be considered.
- Investors and other stakeholders should differentiate between financed emissions and real emissions. Financed emissions represent financial instruments’ exposures to greenhouse gas emissions, while real emissions are generated by companies through their business activities and directly released into the atmosphere. The differentiation makes it clear that reducing an investment portfolio’s financed emissions does not remove CO2 from the atmosphere immediately. The removal of emissions only materialises indirectly and gradually through exerting pressure and signalling to the companies that are (de-)financed. Not differentiating between these two emission types could lead to greenwashing.
- In order to obtain representative portfolio carbon metrics, carbon accounting should rely on the economic exposure of financial instruments to determine the overall financed emissions of portfolios. Alongside the investment in equities and fixed income securities, derivative instruments play a pivotal role in portfolio management. With derivatives, investors can achieve the same economic exposure to a company as through direct investments. Accordingly, when accounting for financed emissions, all types of financial instruments should be considered in accordance with their economic exposure. Otherwise, savvy investors could avoid accounting for emissions in carbon accounting by gaining economic exposure through the use of derivatives, while bypassing the accountability of financed emissions. Not taking derivatives into account in the carbon accounting would consequently open the floodgates to greenwashing.
- The overall amount of financed emissions should always be equal to the amount of real emissions of a company. Because derivative contracts always have two contracting parties, financed emissions should be reported both positively and negatively in accordance with their economic exposure, so that derivatives neither increase nor decrease the overall amount of financed emissions. In particular, if derivatives were to artificially increase the total amount of financed emissions, this would lead to a misleading scenario in which the overall financed emissions would be larger than and disentangled from the real emissions. On the other hand, if derivatives were to artificially decrease the total amount of financed emissions, this would open the doors to greenwashing.
Please refer to the full report here: Avoiding greenwashing in investment portfolios through consistent emissions classification and transparent reporting of derivatives
Finreon is an established spin-off from the University of St.Gallen and offers competent and professional services in the field of asset management und finance. Our concepts are based on years of practical experience, combined with the latest findings in financial market theory.
Photo credit: © Finreon
Related insights
-
Published by Global Reporting Initiative
2024-02-27
More progress still needed on sustainability assurance
IFAC research finds the GRI Standards remain the most frequently used and assured…
-
Published by investESG
2024-02-15
How can EU firms validate their green claims to comply with EU ban on greenwashing of products?
The Internal Market and Environment committees adopted on Wednesday their position on the rules on…
-
Published by investESG
2024-02-07
Red flags and green flags: Is your transition plan fit for purpose and greenwashing-proof?
INSIGHT by Reclaim Finance…
Related insights
-
Published by investESG
2024-02-07
Red flags and green flags: Is your transition plan fit for purpose and greenwashing-proof?
INSIGHT by Reclaim Finance…
-
Published by investESG
2024-01-10
The role of water security in reaching net-zero emissions: energy companies deeply exposed to water risks | CDP
Data released today by the global non-profit, CDP, provides fresh insight into how companies and…
-
Published by investESG
2024-01-08
Moving from pledges to implementation: a guide for corporate just transition action | World Benchmarking Alliance
brief INSIGHT by the World Benchmarking Alliance…
Related insights
-
Published by Novisto
2023-09-03
GHG Protocol - updates to the suite of corporate standards
Last month, the GHG Protocol provided a summary of consultation feedback on its carbon accounting…
-
Published by CFA Institute
2023-07-03
New Online Course: Climate Finance
CFA Institute and ACCA have joined forces to meet the climate-related skills gap with our new…